Investment Arbitration

We act and have acted in numerous investment arbitrations, including dozens of ICSID arbitrations, representing both States/State entities and investors.

We fully grasp the policy and political dimensions that are often at play in a dispute involving State interests.  Our team’s expertise in investment treaty practice is widely recognized in the market, with our lawyers having achieved success in numerous historic cases.

We have assisted numerous clients in addressing emerging international investment disputes through skilful negotiation, strategic public relations, and political initiatives. By invoking the relevant framework of treaty rights and remedies, our clients frequently manage to safeguard foreign investments and reputations successfully, navigating controversy without the need for litigation or arbitration.

We advise investors and States on the interplay of arbitration and EU Law, particularly in the investment treaty context. Our lawyers understand the complex issues that arise under intra-EU BITS and from the EU’s new competence in investment matters.

Elegantly crafted

upon solid foundations

Our Representative Experience

We have represented, and continue to represent, clients in over a dozen investment arbitrations.

Mining, Oil and Gas Sector

Our team is particularly renowned for their focus on the energy sector, having represented exploration and production companies, electricity and gas transmission and pipeline operators, public utilities and governments, amongst other clients.

  • Glencore International A.G. and C.I. Prodeco S.A. v. Republic of Colombia (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/16/6: represented the Republic of Colombia in an ICSID arbitration under the Colombia-Switzerland BIT, in a dispute arising out of the alleged threat of annulling a major amendment to a mining exploitation contract for a large-scale coal project and the imposition of a fine.  The dispute centered, inter alia, on whether the amendment had been concluded in accordance with domestic regulations governing mining contracts.  The tribunal dismissed most claims on the merits as well as the request for injunctive relief, awarding only 3% of the amount claimed.
  • South American Silver Limited v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2013-15: represented the Plurinational State of Bolivia in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the UK-Bolivia BIT, in a dispute arising out of the revocation of mining licenses due to social unrest, interference with indigenous peoples’ rights and environmental concerns.  Rejecting the bulk of the claims, the tribunal only awarded sunk costs.
  • Quiborax S.A., Non-Metallic Minerals S.A. v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/2: represented the Plurinational State of Bolivia in an ICSID arbitration under the Bolivia-Chile BIT, in a dispute arising out of the termination of a mining concession contract for the exploration and exploitation of non-metallic minerals in the Salar de Uyuni area.   The Tribunal reduced the claim by 66% of the amount requested by the investor.
  • PDZ (UK) Ltd. and PD Co Holdings (UK) Ltd. v. The Republic of Poland, PCA Case No. 2021-06 and PDZ Holdings PTY Ltd. v. The Republic of Poland, PCA Case No. 2020-52: representing the Republic of Poland in two parallel UNCITRAL arbitrations under the Energy Charter Treaty and the Australia-Poland BIT, in a dispute over investments in the coal industry.
  • The Estate of Julio Miguel Orlandini-Ágreda and Compañía Minera Orlandini Ltda. v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2018-39: representing the Plurinational State of Bolivia in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the US-Bolivia BIT, in a dispute arising in connection with mining concessions.
  • Glencore International A.G., C. I. Prodeco S.A., and Sociedad Portuaria Puerto Nuevo S.A. v. Republic of Colombia (II), ICSID Case No. ARB/19/22: representing the Republic of Colombia in an ICSID arbitration under the Colombia-Switzerland BIT, in a dispute arising out of the construction and maintenance of the access channel to the public coal port of Puerto Nuevo, associated regulations, and their impact on coal exports and coal pricing.
  • Glencore Finance (Bermuda) Ltd. v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2016-39: representing the Plurinational State of Bolivia in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the UK-Bolivia BIT, in a dispute arising out of the reversion of Bolivia’s largest tin/zinc mine, a tin smelter and an antimony smelter. The reversion of the mine was due to violent protests (triggered by the mine operator’s mismanagement of the relationship with the informal mining workers), which, in turn, led to the unlawful occupation of the mine. The reversions of the tin smelter were due to irregularities in its privatization, whereas the reversion of the antimony smelter was due to its inactivity.
  • Burlington Resources, Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/5: represented the Republic of Ecuador in an ICSID arbitration under the US-Ecuador BIT, in a dispute arising from Ecuador’s windfall profit tax on oil revenues and involved counterclaims for environmental harm to the Amazonian rainforest.  The tribunal only awarded 25% of the damages claimed, and, in an unprecedented decision, held Burlington liable for environmental harm.
  • Perenco Ecuador Limited v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/6: represented the Republic of Ecuador in an ICSID arbitration under the Ecuador-France BIT, concerning tax regulations, in which the State successfully raised counterclaims for environmental harm.  In a landmark decision, the tribunal ordered Perenco to pay Ecuador more than US$90 million, plus interest, for soil and groundwater contamination in the Amazon resulting from the investor’s operations.
  • Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Republic of Ecuador (II), ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11: represented the Republic of Ecuador in an ICSID arbitration under the US-Ecuador BIT, in a dispute arising from the termination of a production sharing contract.  In the first annulment of an ICSID award since 2010, the ad hoc committee substantially reduced the amount of damages.
  • Iberdrola Energía, S.A. v. The Republic of Guatemala (II), PCA Case No. 2017-41: represented the Republic of Guatemala in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the Guatemala-Spain BIT, in a dispute relating to changes in the State’s electricity regulations.  The tribunal dismissed all claims for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Guaracachi America, Inc. and Rurelec PLC v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2011-17: represented the Plurinational State of Bolivia in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the US-Bolivia and UK-Bolivia BITs, in a dispute arising from the nationalization of the largest private electricity generation company in the country.  The tribunal dismissed most claims for lack of jurisdiction.
  • IC Power Asia Development Ltd. v. Republic of Guatemala, PCA Case No. 2019-43: represented the Republic of Guatemala in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the Israel-Guatemala BIT, in a dispute arising from the investor’s non-compliance with local income tax regulations and the ensuing tax investigation.  The claims were dismissed in their entirety.

Telecoms Industry

Numerous multinational corporations consider arbitration as their favored choice for dispute resolution.  Our lawyers possess the expertise to navigate the intricate technicalities of disputes in this specialized sector.

  • América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V. v. Republic of Colombia, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/16/5: represented the Republic of Colombia in an ICSID(AF) arbitration under the Colombia-Mexico-Venezuela FTA, in a dispute arising from Colombia’s enforcement of a contractual clause providing for the restitution of assets to the State after the termination of a concession contract for the provision of mobile telecom services.  The claims were dismissed in their entirety.

Construction and Real Estate Sector

We advise clients on multiple international construction and real estate investment arbitrations globally.

  • Holding Project Group and others v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/31: representing the Arab Republic of Egypt in an ICSID arbitration under the Egypt-Kuwait BIT, concerning agricultural and urban development projects in the Egyptian desert.
  • Pawlowski AG and Project Sever s.r.o. v. Czech Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/11: represented the Czech Republic in an ICSID arbitration under the Czech Republic-Switzerland BIT, in a dispute arising out of the development of a luxury residential complex, the land for which was re-zoned.  Five out of six claims were dismissed on the merits, and no damages were awarded for the remaining claim.

Other

  • A.M.F. Aircraftleasing Meier & Fischer GmbH & Co. KG v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2017-15: represented the Czech Republic in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the Czech Republic-Germany BIT, in a dispute arising out of the alleged confiscation of two aircraft in the context of bankruptcy proceedings.  The claims were dismissed in their entirety.
  • WCV World Capital Ventures Cyprus Limited and Channel Crossings Limited v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2016-12: representing the Czech Republic in an UNCITRAL arbitration under the Czech Republic-Cyprus BIT, in a dispute arising from changes in the regulatory framework for lotteries and gambling.

“The team is widely recognised for its investor-state experience, representing a range of sovereign and state entities in big ticket international mandates.”

—  The Legal 500 Latin America 2025

Key Contacts

José-Manuel García Represa

Founding Partner

“José-Manuel García Represa is an excellent trial lawyer and expert in damages.”

—  Legal 500 Latin America 2023

“He is an extremely diligent person who has a unique ability to see everything that could be relevant, whether in defence or attack.  He knows what he is doing.”

—  Chambers Latin America 2022

José-Manuel is “not only a good lawyer, he also has knowledge of economics and mathematics, a great combination that allows him to offer very technical advice.”

—  Chambers Latin America 2021

“José-Manuel García Represa: in my experience, there are not two like him. His ability to understand, explain, and find, in detail, the strengths of a client’s case and the shortcomings of your opposition is something I have not seen in other attorneys. Certainly, these capabilities make him an outstanding court examiner.”

—  The Legal 500 Latin America 2021

“He is fantastic at analysing what is going on under various scenarios, and he is very fast.”

—  Chambers Latin America 2020

Biography

José-Manuel García Represa is a founding partner at Wordstone, specializing in international commercial arbitration and investment arbitration in proceedings under the major institutional rules including UNCITRAL, ICSID, ICC, among others.

José-Manuel’s practice focuses on disputes relating to Latin America, Europe and Africa. He regularly represents clients in arbitrations involving concession contracts, hydrocarbons, engineering and construction, the generation and distribution of electric power (both renewable and conventional), mining, and industrial facilities. He also regularly acts as an arbitrator.

Consistently recognised as one of the market’s leading international arbitration experts, José-Manuel maintains strong rankings in the global Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 directories. He is consistently recognized in the Chambers Europe, Global and Latin America Guides for his international arbitration expertise, and a client highlights that José-Manuel is “absolutely fantastic to work with; he is diligent and respects timelines. He provides us with excellent work products.” Furthermore, Chambers notes his active role “across the oil and gas, energy and telecommunications sectors” and that he “regularly acts for sovereigns and private investors on investor-state cases across Latin America”. In The Legal 500 Guide, José-Manuel is ranked as a ‘Leading Individual’ for international arbitration, with the directory praising him as a “stellar practitioner”, an “excellent cross-examiner” with strong “experience in economics and calculations”. The Who’s Who Legal Guide recognizes José-Manuel as a Thought Leader for arbitration and he is also Recommended in the Who’s Who Legal Mining and Construction Guides. He is described as an “outstanding advocate” and “simply the best lawyer of his generation”. José-Manuel has also recently been featured in the GAR 45 under 45 2023 directory.

In 2018, José-Manuel was appointed as a member of the ICC Working Group on Climate Change Arbitrations and presently sits as Chair of the Spanish Arbitration Club (CEA) in France.

José-Manuel teaches Damages at Sciences Po Law School (LL.M. in Transnational Arbitration and Dispute Settlement), the specialization course on disputes in the energy and mining sectors (Energy & Mining Disputes II) at the LL.M. A.W.Ar.D.S (Assas World Arbitration and Disputes Settlement) of the University Paris II – Panthéon Assas, and Witness & Expert Cross-Examination at the Swiss Arbitration Academy.

Testimonials

“José-Manuel is one of the lawyers that I admire the most in Paris. I must admit that he is excellent – extremely dedicated and able to work in three languages at the same time. He also knows very well both the common law and civil law systems.” – Chambers Global 2024

“José-Manuel García Represa is absolutely fantastic to work with; he is diligent and respects timelines. He provides us with excellent work products.” – Chambers Global 2024

“He is extremely competent. He is an incredibly mature person with tremendous expertise and experience behind him.” – Chambers Global 2024

“José-Manuel García Represa of Wordstone Dispute Resolution regularly acts for sovereigns and private investors on investor-state cases across Latin America.” – Chambers Latin America 2024

“José-Manuel García Represa… focuses on investment arbitrations, often acting in cases with Latin American elements. He is active across the oil and gas, energy and telecommunications sectors.” – Chambers Global 2024

“His intellectual capacities are extraordinary, and he is able to handle the most difficult issues in international arbitrations.” – Chambers Latin America 2023

“He has a very comprehensive approach of the cases he handles and this is because he knows his cases in depth. You can feel it at the hearings, he has both a legal and strategic vision of the cases.” – Chambers France 2021

“An experienced figure” – The Legal 500

“José-Manuel has a lot of experience in economics and calculations.” – The Legal 500

An “excellent cross-examiner” – The Legal 500

“José-Manuel is an outstanding advocate” – Who’s Who Legal

“He is simply the best lawyer of his generation” – Who’s Who Legal

“He is a really strong cross-examiner” – Who’s Who Legal

Recent Experience

  • Representing a French engineering and construction company in an ICC arbitration with a Central American State entity related to the construction of a hydroelectric power generation plant.
  • Representing an Argentinean construction group against the Republic of Peru in an ICSID arbitration arising out of the alleged wrongful termination of a highway construction and concession contract.
  • Representing a group of Costa Rican and Dutch investors in a dispute against Panama relating to a hotel development.
  • Representing Colombian investors against the Republic of Chile relating to investments in the transportation industry.
  • Representing Interconexión, a large power transmission company, against the Republic of Chile, in an ICSID arbitration under the Free Trade Agreement Colombia – Chile, relating to the construction and operation of a power line and the imposition of fines by the State.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in several investment arbitration with foreign oil & gas, mining and telecommunications companies.
  • Representing the Plurinational State of Bolivia in several investment disputes arising from nationalizations and other measures in the mining, telecommunications, airports, and oil & gas sectors.
  • Representing the Republic of Colombia in various investment disputes.
  • Representing the Republic of Guatemala in a PCA-UNCITRAL arbitration arising from the investor’s non-compliance with local income tax regulations and the ensuing tax investigations.
  • Representing the Republic of Poland in two parallel PCA-UNCITRAL arbitrations arising out of the alleged loss of the claimants’ investments in coal mines.
  • Representing the Argentine Republic in an ICSID arbitration arising out of tariff regulations for electricity generation and distribution.
  • Representing the Arab Republic of Egypt against 13 Kuwaiti claimants in an ICSID arbitration arising from a project to develop desert land for urban and agricultural use.
  • Represented an American bank’s Spanish subsidiary against a Spanish bank in an ICC arbitration arising from a Business Transfer Agreement.
  • Represented a concessionaire company against the Republic of Peru in a dispute arising from the breach of a concession contract for the construction and operation of toll highway.
  • Represented a French leader in the engineering and building sectors against a Qatar company in an ICC arbitration arising from contracts for the design and engineering of two major expressways in the Middle East.
  • Represented Guatemala’s largest solar power generating company against Guatemala’s manpower distribution company in an ICC arbitration arising from the breach of two PPAs for solar plants.
  • Represented a leading container shipping company against the operator of a container terminal in Northern African in an ICC arbitration arising from a joint venture for the exploitation of a container terminal.
  • Represented a BVI telecommunications company and South Sudanese telecommunications company against an African State in an ICC arbitration arising from the termination of their operating license.
  • Represented the Spanish subsidiary of a multinational electric equipment supplier against a Spanish electric utility company in an ICC arbitration arising from alleged defects in equipment installed at a nuclear plan.
  • Represented the Algeria-based joint-venture of three major oil & gas companies against a Lebanese and Algerian construction JV in a dispute arising from delays and costs related to the construction of the base camp of a gas field.
  • Represented a French pharmaceutical group against a Swiss pharmaceutical company in several ICC arbitrations arising from a product distribution licensing agreement.
  • Represented a Spanish construction group in a dispute against a large French construction group relating to the termination of sub-contracts for the construction of a major hospital in France.
  • Represented a Spanish construction group in a dispute involving various FIDIC-type contracts for the construction of a nuclear experimental site in France.
  • Represented a major Spanish oil and gas company in a commercial dispute against a UAE company arising out of an alleged service contracts in the North-African area.
  • Represented the Paraguayan State national oil company (Petropar) against PDVSA in an ICC arbitration arising out of Petrobar’s alleged failure to comply with a cooperation agreement for hydrocarbons supply.
  • Represented a South American Autonomous Municipal Government in an ICC arbitration (and the priori emergency arbitrator proceedings) commenced by a Spanish Consortium, related to the construction of a tramway line.
  • Represented a Central American State entity in two ICC arbitrations related to various contracts for electricity generation.
  • Represented a Central American State against a Spanish investor in an ICC arbitration related to the construction and operation of a 100 MW wind farm.
  • Represented a European State in an ICC arbitration arising from the construction of a bridge between Bulgaria and Romania.
  • Represented a Latin American State in an ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules arising from alleged breaches and termination of a contract for implementing and developing a new resource planning software to administer the national budget.
  • Represented an Ecuadorian national oil company in three ad hoc arbitrations related to the production of crude through secondary and tertiary recovery techniques.
  • Represented the Republic of Ecuador and its National Mining Company (Enami EP) against a Chilean company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a copper mining project.
  • Represented a Bolivian State entity against an Indian company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a contract for the joint exploitation of an iron ore mining concession.
  • Represented two Bulgarian construction companies against their Consortium partner, an Italian construction company, in an ICC arbitration arising from a major highway design and construction project in Bulgaria.

Education

Columbia University – LL.M., 2003, Fulbright Scholar

University of Paris I – Sorbonne, Master in International Business Law, 2001, La Caixa Scholar

Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Bachelor in Law, 2000

University of Paris I – Sorbonne, Bachelor of Law, 2000

Admissions

Madrid, Paris and New York

Languages

Spanish, English and French

Publications

  • Book chapter “Convencer y dejarse convencer. ¿Por qué un argumento funciona ante un tribunal arbitral internacional?”, Libro homenaje a Miguel Ángel Fernández-Ballesteros (2024)
  • Coordinator of the “Panorama de jurisprudencia francesa”, Revista del Club Español e Iberoamericano de Arbitraje/Iurgium (2021-2024)
  • Book chapter “Effectiveness of compliance in environment and human rights: appropriate reparations: corrective actions, affectation of proceeds and rehabilitation over time”, Navigating the New Contents of International Public Policy – Compliance in Environment and Human Rights – ICC Institute Dossier XXI (2023)
  • Book chapter “What does it mean to be ”Pro-arbitration”? a due process analysis in “pro-arbitration”? A Due process analysis”, A tribute to Professor George Bermann from his students over the years, JURIS Arbitration Law (2023)
  • Book chapter “Telecoms arbitrations in Latin America” co-author, The Guide to Telecoms Arbitrations, Global Arbitration Review (2022)
  • Book chapter “mining arbitration in latin america: social and environmental issues in investment arbitration cases” co-author, The Guide to Construction Arbitration, Global Arbitration Review (2019)
  • Book chapter “Construction arbitration and concession contracts” co-author, The Guide to Construction Arbitration, Global Arbitration Review (2016, 2018 and 2019)
  • Book chapter “L’interprétation authentique par les parties aux traités” in Colloque : La protection des investissements étrangers : vers une réaffirmation de l’Etat ? (T. El Ghabdan, C. Mazuy, and A. Senegacnik coord., ed. A. Pedone, Paris, 2018)
  • Book chapter “Regionalization trends and foreign investment in South America: the implications of the ALBA and UNASUR initiatives” in The regionalization of international investment treaty arrangements 225 (N.J. Calamita and M. Sattarova eds., London, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2015)
  • Book chapter “El papel controvertido de las comisiones ad hoc frente a las limitaciones inherentes al régimen de anulación de laudos arbitrales en el sistema de arbitraje del CIADI”, co-authored with Ana Carolina Simões e Silva, in Arbitraje Internacional, Pasado, Presente y Futuro, Libro homenaje a Bernardo Cremades e Yves Derains, Instituto Peruano de Arbitraje (2013)
  • Article “Los límites de la protección jurídica de la inversión minera”, co-authored with Eduardo Silva Romero, Energiminas (June 2012) reprinted in Al Derecho y al Reves (2012) & Revista Legal Columnas (2011)
  • Contributor to the “Panorama de jurisprudencia francesa”, Revista del Club Español de Arbitraje (2009)
  • Contributor to the “Panorama de jurisprudencia francesa”, Revista del Club Español de Arbitraje (2008)
  • Article “La consolidation de l’arbitrage commercial international au Brésil: état des lieux 2008”, co-authored with Philip Dunham, Décideurs Stratégie Finance Droit (2008)

Rankings & Recognitions

Chambers Global 2024

  • Band 3 – Arbitration (International) (Latin America – International Counsel)
  • Band 3 – International Arbitration (France)
  • Foreign Expert – International Arbitration (France)

Latin America 2024

  • Band 3 – International Arbitration (International Counsel)

Chambers Europe 2024

  • Band 3 – International Arbitration (France)

The Legal 500

  • Leading Individual – Latin America: International Firms, International Arbitration
  • Recommended – Dispute Resolution: International Arbitration (France)

Who’s Who Legal

  • WWL Thought Leader – France – Arbitration
  • WWL Thought Leader – Arbitration
  • WWL Thought Leader – Arbitration
  • WWL Mining
  • WWL Arbitration
  • WWL Construction

Global Arbitration Review

  • GAR: 45 Under 45 2023

Awards & Associations

  • President of the Club Español del Arbitraje (CEA) in France
  • Member of the ICC Institute of World Business Law
  • Member of the ICC Spanish Committee
  • Member of the International Bar Association
  • Member of the Advisory Board of the Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)
  • Member of the Latin American Arbitration Association (ALARB)

Eduardo Silva-Romero

Founding Partner

“Wordstone has two truly lethal weapons. The duo Eduardo Silva Romero and José Manuel García Represa has few rival in the global legal market”

—  Chambers Latin America 2025

“Wordstone has two truly lethal weapons. The duo Eduardo Silva Romero and José Manuel García Represa has few rival in the global legal market”

—  The Legal 500 Latin American 2025

“A great leader and he has an ability to drive the defence of a case. He is the orchestra conductor coordinating everything and a very good pleader.”

—  Chambers Europe 2023

“Eduardo Silva Romero is one of the top figures in international arbitration.”

—  Chambers Europe 2023

‘Indisputable experience in commercial and investment arbitration’ and focuses primarily on arbitration involving states and state-owned entities.”

—  The Legal 500

“Eduardo masterfully conducts hearings as arbitrator.”

—  Who's Who Legal

Biography

Eduardo Silva-Romero is a founding partner at Wordstone, specialising in international commercial and investment arbitration, with a historic focus on disputes involving States and State-owned entities.

Eduardo is recognised as one of the world’s most in-demand arbitrators, having acted in over 180 international commercial and investment cases under a wide variety of institutional rules.

Eduardo has advised and advises on arbitration matters conducted under the auspices of ICC, ICSID, PCA, LCIA, ICDR and SCC, as well as in ad hoc proceedings under the UNCITRAL and EDF arbitration rules.

Eduardo is consistently recognized in the Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500 directories as one of the most pre-eminent arbitration practitioners globally. He is commended as “a great leader” and “the orchestra conductor coordinating everything and a very good pleader.” References also note Eduardo “has an ability to drive the defence of a case” and is an “exceptional” practitioner “who understands how clients work”.

Eduardo also maintains a Band 1 ranking in the Chambers Latin America Guide 2024 for international arbitration, and he is highlighted “as an authority in the international arbitration market” and an “exceptional partner” who is “vastly experienced and thoroughly knows the procedures and the market”. In The Legal 500, Eduardo is ranked in its Hall of Fame for international arbitration. That Guide praises his “indisputable experience in commercial and investment arbitration”. In the Who’s Who Legal Guide, Eduardo is recognized as a Global Elite Thought Leader for Arbitration across several of its global guides. A commentator notes he is “very impressive” and another states they would “trust Eduardo as arbitrator without question”.

Eduardo is a former Deputy Secretary General of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, and he currently is the Chair of the ICC Institute of World Business Law and a member of the ICC Court.

Eduardo has published several articles, books and chapters on international arbitration, including its lectures on “Legal Fictions in the Language of International Arbitration” delivered at the Hague Academy of International Law in 2019. He also lectures on Investment Arbitration and International Contracts at Sciences Po in Paris, international arbitration at Paris II University, international commercial arbitration involving States and State entities, Arbitration at the University of Paris-Dauphine, and is Professor Emeritus at the University of Rosario in Bogotá.

Testimonials

“This is done with the highest level of professionalism.” –  Chambers Latin America 2025

“Eduardo Silva Romero stands out for tending to highly complex matters while making them easy to understand as a client.” – Chambers Latin America 2025

“I strongly recommend Eduardo Silva Romero, a legal eminence who is highly respected and admired in the international arbitration community.” – Chambers Latin America 2025

“Based on his unparalleled knowledge and worldwide practice, Eduardo provides top-notch advice on the procedural intricacies of international arbitration.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo Silva Romero operates at a high professional level. He has great comprehension and research capabilities, as well as excellent soft skills.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo is an exceptional partner. He is vastly experienced and thoroughly knows the procedures and the market.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo is fantastic. He is great at client relations.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo is superb. He has a global approach to arbitration.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo is excellent at hearings.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo is outstanding.” – Chambers Global 2024

“Eduardo is fantastic, he is great at client relations.” – Chambers Global 2024

A “Brilliant Mind” – The Legal 500 Latin America 2025

“Very responsible, always ready to help.” – The Legal 500

“As a lawyer, despite having a busy schedule, he always responded to my queries and calls regardless of what time it was. He has extensive experience in construction arbitrations and representing States.” – The Legal 500

“I trust Eduardo as arbitrator without question.” – Who’s Who Legal 2024

“He is very impressive.” – Who’s Who Legal 2024

Recent Experience

  • Representing the Czech Republic in four investment arbitrations in the real estate, gaming, telecoms and airplanes sectors.
  • Representing Republic of Poland in two parallel investment arbitrations initiated under the Energy Charter Treaty and the Australia-Poland BIT, arising out of the alleged loss of the claimants’ investments in  thermal coal mining projects in Poland.
  • Representing the Arab Republic of Egypt in a US$8 billion claim sought by Kuwaiti claimants over a cancelled project to build a new city at the south of Cairo.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in ten investment and commercial arbitrations in, for instance, the telecommunication, oil and gas, construction and mining concession sectors.
  • Representing the Plurinational State of Bolivia in eleven investment arbitrations (under the auspices of ICSID or under the UNCITRAL rules) and one commercial arbitration involving several sectors, including telecommunications, infrastructure, mining, energy and oil and gas.
  • Representing the Republic of Colombia in five investment arbitrations (under the auspices of ICSID or under the UNCITRAL rules) in the mining and telecommunication sectors.
  • Representing a group of Costa Rican and Dutch investors against a Central American State in an ICSID arbitration relating to the construction and development of an ecotourist resort.
  • Representing a French multinational in a dispute with a Central American state entity in an ICC arbitration related to the construction of a hydro electrical plant.
  • Representing a Brazilian company against a Portuguese group of companies in an ICC arbitration arising from fraudulent schemes in the execution of several financial agreements concluded for the financing of a construction project.
  • Representing a leading European gas company in its gas pricing dispute against another leading European gas company in a potential ICC arbitration arising from a long term gas supply contract.
  • Representing a French fund against a French company in an ad hoc arbitration arising from a shareholders agreement in the food industry.
  • Representing a leading American technology company against a South Korean company in an ICC arbitration relating to the softwares of the smartphones.
    Representing a Spanish company against two Peruvian companies in an AAA arbitration related to the breach of a shareholders agreement.
  • Representing a BVI telecommunications company and a South Sudanese telecommunications company against South Sudan in an ICC arbitration arising from the termination of their operating license.

Education

University of Paris II – Assas, Doctorate (Docteur en Droit Summa Cum Laude), 2000

University of Paris II – Assas, Master in Philosophy of Law (DEA), 1996

University of Paris II – Assas, Master in Private International Law (DSU), 1995

University of Paris II – Assas, Masters in Comparative Law and Legal Linguistics, 1995

Universidade del Rosario de Bogotá, Lawyer’s Diploma, 1993

Admissions

Bogota and Paris

Languages

English, Spanish, French and Portuguese

Publications

  • “Chronique de jurisprudence arbitrale en droit des investissements ”, Revue de l’arbitrage, n°2, 2024)
  • “La presunción de competencia y deber de diligencia de los inversores internacionales”, Revista Jurídica de Arbitraje del Centro de Arbitraje de México, n°2, 2023
  • “Legal Fictions in the Language of International Arbitration” (Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law, Brill, 2022)
  • “The Legal Fiction of the Seat of the International Arbitration”, in Achieving the Arbitration Dream: Liber Amicorum for Professor Julian D.M. Lew KC, Kluwer Law International, 2023.
  • “What places for Compliance in investment arbitration?”, in Frison-Roche, M.-A.(ed.), Compliance Jurisdictionalisation, series “Compliance & Regulation”, Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant, 2023.
  • “L’arbitrage d’investissement impliquant les états, une tendance croissante au sein de l’ICC”, in Echanges internationaux, 2022.
  • “Arbitration, a Form of Life”, in “Arbitration and beyond… Une forme de vie”, Liber Amicorum pour Yves Derains, Éditions A. Pedone, 2021.
  • “Le règlement d’arbitrage de la Chambre de commerce internationale (CCI) de 2021”, in Revue de l’arbitrage, n° 4, 2020.
  • “Mining Arbitration in Latin America: Social and Environmental Issues in Investment Arbitration Cases” in The Guide to Mining Arbitrations, Global Arbitration Review, 2019.
  • “L’annulation des sentences CIRDI impliquant un État d’Afrique”, in Un demi-siècle africain d’arbitrage d’investissement CIRDI, LGDJ, 2019.
  • France Chapter in “Sovereign Immunity 2019”, in Lexology Getting The Deal Through, 2019.
  • “Energy Investor-State Disputes in Latin America” in International Arbitration in the Energy Sector, Ed. Maxi Scherer, Oxford University Press, 2018.
  • “Arbitrating the Conduct of International Investors”, in ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2018.
  • “La extensión del convenio arbitral a partes no signatarias en Europa: ¿un enfoque uniforme?”, in Revista de Arbitraje, PUCP No. 7, 2017.
  • “Some Remarks on the Contribution of ICC Arbitrators to the Development of International Commercial Arbitration Involving States and State Entities”, in International Arbitration Under Review, ICC Publication, 2015.
  • “Consolidation and Parallel Proceedings”, in Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID, Kluwer, 2015.
  • “Actualité des Clauses de Stabilisation”, in Le contentieux extractif, ICC Publications, No. 770F, 2015.

Rankings & Recognitions

Chambers Latin America 2025

  • Band 1 – International Arbitration (International Counsel)
  • Band 1 – International Arbitration: Arbitrators (International Counsel)

The Legal 500 2025

  • Hall of Fame – Dispute Resolution: International Arbitration (France)
  • Hall of Fame – Latin America: International Firms, International Arbitration

The Best Lawyers in France™

  • Lawyer of the year 2025 – International Arbitration
  • Recommended – International Arbitration
  • Recommended – Arbitration & Mediation

Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Litigators 2024

  • Global Litigators

Chambers Global 2024

  • Band 1 – Arbitration (International) (Latin America – International Counsel)
  • Band 1 – International Arbitration (France)
  • Band 1 – International Arbitration: Most In Demand Arbitrators (Latin America – International Counsel)
  • Band 2 – International Arbitration: Most In Demand Arbitrators (Europe-wide)
  • Band 2 – Arbitration (International) (Global Market Leaders)
  • Band 2 – International Arbitration: Arbitrators (France)
  • Band 3 – Arbitration (International) (Europe-wide)
  • Foreign Expert – International Arbitration (France)

Chambers Latin America 2024

  • Band 1 – International Arbitration (International Counsel)
  • Band 1 – International Arbitration: Arbitrators (International Counsel)

Chambers Europe 2024

  • Band 1 – International Arbitration (France)
  • Band 2 – International Arbitration: Arbitrators (France)
  • Band 2 – International Arbitration: Most In Demand Arbitrators (Europe-wide)
  • Band 3 – Arbitration (International) (Europe-wide)

The Legal 500 2024

  • Hall of Fame – Dispute Resolution: International Arbitration (France)
  • Hall of Fame – Latin America: International Firms, International Arbitration

Who’s Who Legal 2024

  • WWL Thought Leader in Thought Leaders – Arbitration
  • WWL Thought Leader in Thought Leaders – France
  • WWL Global Elite Thought Leader in Thought Leaders – Global Elite
  • WWL Global Elite Thought Leader in Arbitration
  • WWL Recommended in Energy
  • WWL Recommended in France

Awards & Associations

  • Chair of the ICC Institute of World Business Law
  • Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) for Colombia
  • Former Member of the ICC International Court of Arbitration
  • Former Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association (IBA)

Catalina Echeverri Gallego

Partner

“Catalina Echeverri Gallego is a great professional to work with. The way that she tackles an issue is great and she has extensive knowledge of the law.”

—  Chambers Latin America 2025

“Catalina Echeverri Gallego is a great professional to work with. The way that she tackles an issue is great and she has extensive knowledge of the law.”

—  Chambers Latin America 2025

“Catalina Echeverri is an exceptional person and great professional, always ready to attend to our concerns no matter what time it is; 100% analytical and methodical.”

—  The Legal 500 2024

“She is an excellent professional. It is a pleasure to work with highly skilled and committed people like her.”

—  Chambers Latin America 2023

Biography

Catalina Echeverri Gallego is a partner at Wordstone Dispute Resolution, specializing in international arbitration and working on both investment treaty and commercial arbitration matters.  With over a decade of experience, Catalina has advised numerous clients in high-profile disputes, actively participating in negotiations, arbitration proceedings, and post-arbitration matters across a broad range of industries.

With an academic background in public policy from the University of Oxford, Catalina has dedicated her practice to cases involving sovereign states, state-owned entities, and state-owned companies. Her experience extends to navigating complex disputes spanning multiple jurisdictions, involving the application of public and private international law, and domestic legislation.

Catalina has acted in cases administered by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), and other institutions, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules. She has not only provided legal representation, but has also acted as sole arbitrator and president of the arbitral tribunal in international commercial arbitration.

Recognized for her expertise, Catalina has earned accolades in prestigious publications such as Chambers Global and Latin America guides, where she is praised for her “extensive knowledge of the law”, “high professional level” and “great analytical skills”. A commentator also notes she “is always read to tend to our needs.” In The Legal 500, she is described as “an exceptional person and great professional”, commended for her “100% analytical and methodical” approach.

In 2024, she was appointed as a delegate to the Global ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR for the 2024-2027 mandate.

Catalina currently teaches International Contract Law at Sciences Po in Paris, and has lectured at universities in the United States, France, Colombia, Guatemala, Argentina, and Bolivia.

Testimonials

“Catalina Echeverri Gallego is a great professional to work with. The way that she tackles an issue is great and she has extensive knowledge of the law.” – Chambers Latin America 2025

“Catalina Echeverri is an exceptional person and great professional, always ready to attend to our concerns no matter what time it is; 100% analytical and methodical.” – The Legal 500 2024

“Catalina Echeverri Gallego performs at a high professional level. She has great analytical skills, and is always ready to tend to our needs.” Chambers Latin America and Global 2024

“She is an excellent professional. It is a pleasure to work with highly skilled and committed people like her.” – Chambers Latin America 2023

Recent Experience

  • Representing a South American State in an UNCITRAL investment arbitration commenced by a British company, concerning the exploitation of a silver mine that interfered with the rights of indigenous communities living in the project area.
  • Representing a South American State-owned enterprise in an ICSID arbitration against a South American State concerning the construction of a power transmission line.
  • Representing a Central American State in an ICSID arbitration commence by a Colombian company concerning the construction of a power transmission line.
  • Representing South American State in ICSID annulment proceedings concerning an award that solved a dispute regarding a participation contract for the exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons in the Amazon region.
  • Representing Caribbean State in an ICC commercial arbitration commenced by a Spanish company, concerning a concession contract for the construction and operation of a wind farm, as well as the negotiation of a power purchase agreement with a state-owned entity.
  • Representing a Caribbean state entity in an UNCITRAL commercial arbitration commenced by a Spanish company concerning the rehabilitation of the country’s electricity transmission networks and force majeure allegations in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Representing a Central American State in an UNCITRAL investment arbitration commenced by an Israeli company operating in the electricity distribution sector concerning criminal tax fraud claims brought by the country’s tax administration.
  • Representing a South American State in an ICSID arbitration commenced by a Swiss company concerning a concession for the operation of a maritime port and the application of the country’s antitrust regulations.
  • Representing a South American State in two ICSID arbitrations commenced by a Mexican and a Spanish Company, concerning a concession contract in the telecommunications industry, a decision of the Constitutional Court of the State and a decision of a domestic arbitral tribunal.
  • Representing the port authority of a South American State in a commercial arbitration against a Chinese company in a dispute related to a concession contract for the renovation and operation of a maritime port.
  • Representing a South American State in an UNCITRAL investment arbitration commenced by a Spanish company, concerning the concession for the operation of the country’s three international airports.
  • Representing a South American State in ICSID annulment proceedings concerning an award that solved a dispute regarding 11 mining concessions.
  • Representing a family of prominent investors in a post-M&A dispute concerning the acquisition of a pharmaceutical laboratory.

Education

University of Oxford, Master of Public Policy, 2017, Chevening Scholar 2016

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Law, 2010

Admissions

Colombia

Admitted to practice as a foreign legal consultant in Paris

Languages

Spanish, English and French

Publications

  • Latin American Panorama, in Journal of International Arbitration / Les Cahiers de l’Arbitrage (2024)
  • Relationship between domestic and international law, in Handbook of International Law (Universidad de los Andes de Colombia) (2023)
  • Telecoms Arbitration in Latin America, in Global Arbitration Review Guide to Telecoms Arbitration (Global Arbitration Review) (2022)
  • International Investment Arbitration in the Latin-American Electricity Sector, in Latin America: Energy & Natural Resources Disputes (Kluwer) (2021)
  • Group Arbitration in International E-Commerce Contracts, in 40 Under 40 in International Arbitration (Dykinson) (2021)

Rankings & Recognitions

Chambers Latin America 2025

Up and Coming: International Arbitration (International Counsel)

Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Litigators 2024

Global Litigators

Chambers Global 2024

Up and Coming: Arbitration (International)

Chambers Latin America 2024

Up and Coming: International Arbitration (International Counsel)

The Legal 500 Latin America 2024

Rising Star – Latin America: International Firms (International Arbitration)

Recommended – Dispute Resolution: International Arbitration (France)

Awards & Associations

Delegate of the Global ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR (2024-2027 mandate)

Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR)

Asociación Latinomericana de Arbitraje (ALARB)

Club Español del Arbitraje (CEA)

Comité Colombiano de Arbitraje

Commission ICC Colombia

Audrey Caminades

Of Counsel

Biography

Audrey Caminades specialises in international commercial and investment arbitration, with a focus on disputes involving states and state-owned entities and a particular expertise in the EMEA region.  Over the past 15 years, she has acted as counsel in more than 30 arbitrations, under the major institutional rules, including UNCITRAL, ICSID, ICC, and primarily focusing on the energy, mining, telecommunications and banking sectors.

Audrey has acted as arbitrator in ICC arbitrations, and as administrative secretary of tribunals in more than 20 cases, under the major institutional rules including UNCITRAL, ICSID, ICC, EDF, SCC, among others.

Audrey is a visiting lecturer on international arbitration at the Panthéon-Assas University (Paris II) and has taught at several universities and schools of law, including Science Po Paris.

Recent Experience

As arbitrator

  • Sole Arbitrator in an ICC arbitration between two French companies relating to a contract for technical assistance in connection with several construction projects in Morocco (Paris seat; French law).
  • Sole Arbitrator in an ICC arbitration between a Bulgarian company, an Austrian company, an American company, a Polish company and a Luxembourg company relating to a contract for the provision of services (Paris seat; English law).

As Counsel in ICC cases

  • Representing two Brazilian companies against a French Banking institution in two parallel ICC arbitrations arising from a purchase and service contract, a credit agreement and a bank guarantee (Paris Seat; French law).
  • Representing a French company against a Swiss company in two ICC arbitrations in the pharmaceutical sector (Brussels seat; Belgium law).
  • Representing a French company against a Swiss company in an ICC arbitration arising out of alleged breaches of a distribution agreement (Geneva seat; Swiss law).
  • Representing a South Sudanese entity and its parent company (BVI) against South Sudan in an ICC arbitration concerning the termination of a licence in the telecommunications sector (Geneva seat; South Sudanese law).
  • Representing a French oil and gas company against a Lebanese company and its Belgian subsidiary in an ICC arbitration concerning the termination of an agency agreement relating to oil fields in Iraq (Paris seat; French law).
  • Representing a Paraguayan state entity against a Venezuelan state entity in an ICC arbitration relating to an oil sales contract (Paris seat, International law and applicable Venezuelan law).
  • Representing a Brazilian group against a Portuguese group in an ICC arbitration concerning a contractual financing package (Paris seat; French law).
  • Representing a French company against a Swiss company, a Monegasque company and a Dutch company in two ICC arbitrations concerning a bottle decoration contract (Paris seat; French law).
  • Representing a Spanish state entity against a French state entity in an ICC arbitration concerning alleged infringement of know-how in the field of shipbuilding (Paris seat; French law).
  • Representing a Chinese company against a German company in an ICC arbitration concerning the alleged breach of three contracts for the construction of chemical plants (Geneva seat; Swiss law).

As Counsel in Annulment proceedings before the French courts

  • Representing the Republic of Poland in an annulment action before the Paris Court of Appeal against the award rendered in ICSID Arbitration No. ARB(AF)/11/3 “Vincent J. Ryan, Schooner Capital LLC, and Atlantic Investment Partners LLC v. Poland”.
  • Representing the Republic of Poland in an action for annulment before the Paris Court of Appeal against the award rendered in PCA arbitration No. 2017-10 “Slot Group a.s. v. Republic of Poland”.
  • Representing the Republic of Poland in an action for annulment before the Paris Court of Appeal against the award rendered in ICSID Arbitration No. ADHOC/15/1 “Strabag SE, Raiffeisen Centrobank AG and Syrena Immobilien Holding AG v. Republic of Poland”.

As Counsel in Investment cases

  • Representing the Republic of Poland in two PCA-UNCITRAL arbitrations, “PDZ (UK) Ltd. and PD Co Holdings (UK) Ltd. v. the Republic of Poland” (PCA Case No. 2021-06) and “PDZ Holdings PTY Ltd. v. the Republic of Poland” (PCA Case No. 2020-52), both arising from the alleged loss of mining investments.
  • Representing the Republic of Guatemala in the PCA-UNCITRAL arbitration “Iberdrola Energía, S.A. v. Guatemala” (PCA Case No. 2017-41) concerning tariff changes in the electricity sector.
  • Representing the Czech Republic against two US investors in a PCA-UNCITRAL arbitration “WCV World Capital Ventures Cyprus Ltd. and Channel Crossings Ltd v. Czech Republic” (PCA Case No. 2016-12) concerning regulatory changes in the slot machine industry.
  • Representing the Czech Republic in ICSID Arbitration No. ARB/17/11 “Pawlowski AG and Projekt Sever s.r.o. v. Czech Republic” relating to real estate investments in Prague.
  • Representing the Republic of Egypt in ICSID Arbitration No. ARB/18/31 “IHPG et al v. Arab Republic of Egypt”, arising from an agricultural and urban project.
  • Representing two members of a joint venture in ICSID Arbitration No. ARB/17/8 “Rizzani De Eccher S.p.A., Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. and Trévi S.p.A. v. Kuwait” concerning the construction of an expressway in Kuwait.
  • Representing the Republic of Colombia in ICSID arbitration no. ARB/16/6 “Glencore International A.G. and C.I. Prodeco S.A. v. Colombia” concerning the State’s decision to annul an amendment to a mining contract.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in the PCA-UNCITRAL arbitration “Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Company v. Ecuador” (PCA Case No. 2009-23) concerning Chevron and Texaco’s application not to enforce an Ecuadorian decision ordering them to pay USD 18 billion for environmental damage.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in ICSID arbitration no. ARB/06/11 “Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Ecuador” concerning the termination of an oil exploration and exploitation contract.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in ICSID arbitration no. ARB/08/6 “Perenco Ecuador Limited v. Ecuador” concerning the termination of an oil exploration and production contract and the environmental liability of the investor.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in ICSID arbitration no. ARB/08/5 “Burlington Resources, Inc. v. Ecuador” concerning the termination of an oil exploration and exploitation contract and the environmental liability of the investor.

As Counsel in ICSID Annulment proceedings

  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in the action for annulment of the award in ICSID arbitration No. ARB/06/11 “Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Ecuador”.
  • Representing the plurinational State of Bolivia in the action for annulment of the award in ICSID arbitration no. ARB/06/2 “Quiborax S.A. and Non-Metallic Minerals S.A. v. Bolivia”.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in an annulment action against the award in ICSID arbitration No. ARB/08/05 “Burlington Resources, Inc. v. Ecuador”.
  • Representing the Republic of Ecuador in the annulment phase of ICSID Arbitration No. ARB/08/6d “Perenco Ecuador Limited v. Republic of Ecuador”.
  • Representing the Republic of Colombia in the annulment phase of ICSID arbitration no. ARB/16/6 “Glencore International A.G. and C.I. Prodeco S.A. v. Republic of Colombia”.
  • Representing the Czech Republic in the annulment phase of ICSID Arbitration No. ARB/17/11 “Pawlowski AG and Projekt Sever s.r.o. v. Czech Republic”.

As Administrative Secretary to the Tribunal

  • ICC arbitration involving three Portuguese companies in a dispute arising out of a decision of a financial panel (Lisbon seat; Portuguese law).
  • ICC arbitration involving two Israeli companies in a dispute arising out of subcontracts for the construction of a solar thermal power plant (Tel Aviv seat; Israeli law).
  • ICC arbitration involving four Qatari companies in a dispute arising out of a construction subcontract (Doha seat; Qatari law).
  • ICC arbitration between two Kuwaiti citizens relating to the performance of a settlement agreement (Geneva seat; Kuwait law).
  • ICC arbitration between a German company and Chilean companies relating to a contract for the construction of a power plant (Santiago seat; Chilean Law).
  • ICC arbitration between Italian and Brazilian companies relating to a post-acquisition dispute in the field of telecommunications (Paris seat; Brazilian law).
  • ICC arbitration between a French company and a Swiss company relating to an electricity supply contract (Geneva seat; French law).
  • ICC arbitration between an Italian company and a Greek company relating to an equipment contract for a power plant (Brussels seat; Greek law).
  • ICC arbitration between a German company and a Norwegian company relating to a gas supply contract (Stockholm seat; Norwegian law).
  • ICC arbitration between a Belgian company and a Chilean company relating to a cooperation contract (Paris seat; French Law).
  • ICC arbitration between, on the one hand, three Moroccan companies and, on the other hand, a Japanese company and a Spanish company relating to the performance of a seafood distribution contract (Barcelona seat; Spanish Law).
  • ICC arbitration between two French parties relating to a commissioning contract (Paris seat; French law).
  • Arbitration under the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration and under the auspices of the Geneva Chamber of Commerce between, on the one hand, a Swiss company and, on the other hand, a Swiss company, several Dutch companies, a Cypriot company and a Russian company relating to various credit contracts (Geneva seat; Swiss law).
  • Arbitration under the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration and under the auspices of the Geneva Chamber of Commerce between a Brazilian company and a Swiss company relating to a contract for the sale of steel products (Geneva seat; Swiss law).
  • Arbitration under the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration and under the auspices of the Geneva Chamber of Commerce between a Swiss company and an English company relating to an exclusive distribution contract (Geneva seat; Swiss law).
  • VIAC arbitration between Romanian companies in a dispute arising from a turnkey construction contract for an office building in Bucharest (Bucharest seat; Romanian law).
  • Ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules between a Serbian NGO and a Swiss institution in a dispute arising from a financing contract (Geneva seat; UNIDROIT principles).
  • Ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules between a Swiss company and Egyptian citizens in a dispute over a transaction (Paris seat; Egyptian law).
  • SCC arbitration between a European investor and a European State in a dispute over changes to the legal regime applicable to solar thermal power plants.
  • Arbitration Consta Joint Venture v. Chemin de Fer Djibouto-Ethiopien administered by the PCA and under the aegis of the European Development Fund (EDF) rules in a dispute concerning the construction of a railway line.
  • Arbitration “Mattioli Joint Venture v. Ethiopia” administered by the PCA and under the rules of the European Development Fund (EDF) in a dispute concerning the construction of a water extraction and supply system.
  • ICSID arbitration “Alpiq AG v. Romania” (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/28) concerning the termination of an electricity supply contract.
  • ICSID arbitration “Société Industrielle des Boissons de Guinée v. Republic of Guinea” (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/8) in a dispute concerning the alleged expropriation of a beverage company.
  • ICSID arbitration “Dan Cake S.A. v. Hungary” (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/9) in a dispute concerning the alleged expropriation of a pastry business (first phase)

Education

LLM, King’s College London

DEA in Private International Law, University of Paris I – La Sorbonne  (Under the supervision of Professor Pierre Mayer)

Admissions

Paris

Languages

English and French

Publications

Dalloz action, ICC arbitration, Forthcoming.

“Force Majeure Clauses in Extractive Contracts”, Forthcoming.

“Article 48”, in ICSID Practical Commentary, 2019

“Arbitrage et normes en danger”, Contournement, optimisation, évasion : les normes en danger?, Institut Universitaire Varenne, 2019.

“Sovereign Immunity (France)”, Lexology Getting The Deal Through, 2019.

“L’annulation des sentences CIRDI impliquant un État d’Afrique”, Un demi-siècle africain d’arbitrage d’investissement CIRDI, LGDJ, 2019.

“Arbitration in France”, Lexology Getting The Deal Through, 2018.

“Actualité des clauses de stabilisation : la variété des clauses dans les contrats pétroliers, miniers et gaziers sur plusieurs aires géographiques (Amérique latine, Afrique, mer noire, Moyen Orient”, Le contentieux extractif, ICC Publication, 2015

(With Pierre Mayer), « the 60/40 Issue in Oxy », Caso Oxy: Defensa Jurídica de una Decisión Soberana y en Derecho del Estado Ecuatoriano, 2014.

“Quel arbitrage d’investissement (institutionnel ou ad hoc) ?”, Kessedjian (C.) (dir.), Le droit européen et l’arbitrage d’investissement, Editions Panthéon Assas, 2011.

Conferences as Speaker

“Actualité des clauses de stabilisation”, Le contentieux extractif, Conférence ICC, Paris,

“Non-Express Powers in Arbitration: Excess of Powers or Inherent Powers?”, ICC YAF Conference, Paris (Speaker and Organizer)

Awards & Associations

Comité Français de l’arbitrage (CFA)

Member of the ICC France list of arbitrators

French Arbitration Association (AFA)

LCIA Users’ Council

Former Secretary of the Sub-Committee on the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (IBA)